Thursday, January 21, 2010
Twainer
I believe that HuckFinn is a decent novel that has its place in history due to its own ambiguity. tHE VERY FACT THe THE NOVEL CAN BE DEBATED AS IT IS IS WHY IT IS SO IMPORTANT. I believe that this book should be taught in upper class men high school classes. It should be so not because of the novel itself, but the significance of the conversation that can derive from it. To tell you the truth, I do not believe that this novel was brutal enough in showing the horrors of slavery or in its depiction of rural life in the south. Therefore, I think that other books should be taught before, or along with HuckFinn, in order for students to better understand this sad time in out nations history. Children need to be exposed to these atrocities. No one should ever forget or try to ignore what happened then. To do so would only lend itself to a future of repeating the pass, instead of learning from it. I will use the passages that depict Huck's inner moral struggle and what he thinks is the "right" thing to do. I will also use the ending, and show how this dry satire screams out to be hated, on purpose. Twain's writings for the San Francisco Chronicle are incredible similar to to the end of HuckFinn. He wants to sicken you. No book that involves slavery shouldn't. But as I said before, students should read Fredrick Douglas or some other authors, preferably perhaps a slave writer, that more accurately and more upsettingly describe the way things were for slaves back in the eighteenth to nineteenth century America. Is the book racist? Yes. Is that what is in important? No. For the time this book was written this novel was incredibly not racist. When this book was written, African Americans were not considered human by many people in our country. We must always remember and learn from the past, as to never even remotely repeat it again.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think your idea of using Twain's previous anti-racist satire is the best way to explain the ending. Trilling and Elliot both struggled to some up with a satisfactory defense, but using Twain's articles would make a solid argument. You might also want to cite the note in the front of the book, warning readers not to derive too much literal meaning from his words. Hope thats helpful.
ReplyDeleteSo it wasn't racist then, but it is racist now? I think you need to further your explanation in how the book has changed compared to how society has changed. Exposing kids to the truth is something I agree with but remember like the Mom in the movie, some parents don't agree that the times have changed so be careful with that. I think the satire part will be great!
ReplyDeleteI totally agree, Huck Finn was not brutal enough. Think about the books that are taught regarding the Holocaust, Night for example by Ellie Wisel, that book went into far greater detail about the truths of our past, yet no one is challenging it. As for teaching it in a upper class classroom I agree as well, maybe then they could take it like adults and ignore the use of the 'n' word and everything else that people are whining about at notice the significance of the bigger picture. You have good ideas, your papers going to be sick. Good luck
ReplyDeleteMax,
ReplyDeleteA good post--and one that has engendered some helpful commentary from your peers. I like your central argument that the very fact of the book's "ambiguity" toward matters of race, and the controversy that surrounds it, recommends it for inclusion in the classroom (of course, this is pretty much why I choose to teach it). I think you might want to review Peaches Henry's essay (it's included in the packet) as her argument may provide something of a model for your own.
Mostly, I like how you seem genuinely interested in this topic (it comes across in your writing), and I'm anxious to see a draft of your more fully developed essay!